For this assignment, I watched 3
different videos that each discussed negotiation techniques. The first video I
watched was William Ury’s video “The walk from “no” to “yes”. One fact that I
took away from this video was the story at the beginning of his speech
regarding the 3 brothers who were trying to figure out how to divide up 17
camels between themselves. What I took from this short story was how to reach a
mutual benefit between the 3 brothers in how to divide up the camels. Much like
the story people need to step back from situations and find the “18th”
camel in and come to mutual grounds when it comes to a negotiation.
Stephen
Stuart gave the next video I watched and he discussed the Best Alternative to a
Negotiated Agreement (BATNA). In the video he said the best thing to remember
is to not bargain over your position. Any negotiation should produce a wise
agreement, it should be efficient and it should improve the relationship
between parties, not damage them. A wise agreement is one which meets the
legitimate interests of each side to the extent possible and resolves
conflicting interests. Basically this entire speech revolves around the BATNA
and one key fact he pointed out was that a party should not accept a worse
resolution than it’s BATNA and that care should be taken to make sure that
deals are accurately valued, taking all considerations into account.
Margaret
Neale gave the next video I watched and she talked about getting what you want
in a negotiation. In the video she
covered the basic outline of negotiations, one thing I took away from the video
was that you have information that your counterparts don’t have, and that is
what you should bring to the table. If they had all your information, they
wouldn’t need you but because you have unique information and they have unique
information, value is created between yourself and the people you are
negotiating with.